TY - JOUR
T1 - The Sociotechnical Axis of Cohesion for the IS Discipline
T2 - Its Historical Legacy and its Continued Relevance
AU - Sarker, Suprateek
AU - Chatterjee, Sutirtha
AU - Xiao, Xiao
AU - Elbanna, Amany
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - The sociotechnical perspective is often seen as one of the foundational viewpoints—or an “axis of cohesion”—for the Information Systems (IS) discipline, contributing to both its distinctiveness and its ability to coherently expand its boundaries. However, our review of papers in the two leading IS journals from 2000 to 2016 suggests that IS research has lost sight of the discipline’s sociotechnical character, which was widely acknowledged at the discipline’s inception. This is a problem because an axis of cohesion can be fundamental to a discipline’s long-term vitality. In order to address this issue, we offer ways to renew the sociotechnical perspective so that it can continue to serve as a distinctive and coherent foundation for the discipline. Our hope is that the renewed sociotechnical frame for the discipline discussed in the paper holds potential to contribute to the enduring strength of our diverse, distinctive, and yet unified discipline. It also prompts members of the discipline to think more deeply about what it means to be an IS scholar.
AB - The sociotechnical perspective is often seen as one of the foundational viewpoints—or an “axis of cohesion”—for the Information Systems (IS) discipline, contributing to both its distinctiveness and its ability to coherently expand its boundaries. However, our review of papers in the two leading IS journals from 2000 to 2016 suggests that IS research has lost sight of the discipline’s sociotechnical character, which was widely acknowledged at the discipline’s inception. This is a problem because an axis of cohesion can be fundamental to a discipline’s long-term vitality. In order to address this issue, we offer ways to renew the sociotechnical perspective so that it can continue to serve as a distinctive and coherent foundation for the discipline. Our hope is that the renewed sociotechnical frame for the discipline discussed in the paper holds potential to contribute to the enduring strength of our diverse, distinctive, and yet unified discipline. It also prompts members of the discipline to think more deeply about what it means to be an IS scholar.
U2 - 10.25300/MISQ/2019/13747
DO - 10.25300/MISQ/2019/13747
M3 - Article
SN - 0276-7783
VL - 43
SP - 695
EP - 719
JO - MIS Quarterly
JF - MIS Quarterly
IS - 3
ER -