TY - JOUR
T1 - The Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale
T2 - reliability and validity
AU - Collins, J.
AU - Langdon, P E
AU - Barnoux, M
N1 - © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research published by MENCAP and International Association of the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/6/17
Y1 - 2022/6/17
N2 - BACKGROUND: The Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale was developed for use with adults with developmental disabilities targeting fire-related factors thought to be associated with deliberate firesetting behaviour (i.e. attitudes towards fire, fire interest, fire normalisation, identification with fire and fire safety awareness). However, the psychometric properties of the scale are yet to be evaluated.METHOD: The reliability, validity, comprehensibility, relevance and comprehensiveness of the Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale were evaluated. Fifty-nine adults with developmental disabilities, some of whom had a history of firesetting, completed the Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale on two occasions. Feedback about the questionnaire was sought from both participants and professionals.RESULTS: The AFAS has acceptable internal consistency and excellent test-retest reliability. The attitudes towards fire, fire normalisation, poor fire safety subscales and total scores discriminated firesetters from non-firesetters. Content analysis of feedback indicated items of the AFAS were understood, relevant, accessible and comprehensible.CONCLUSION: A larger study is needed to examine the factor structure of the AFAS.
AB - BACKGROUND: The Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale was developed for use with adults with developmental disabilities targeting fire-related factors thought to be associated with deliberate firesetting behaviour (i.e. attitudes towards fire, fire interest, fire normalisation, identification with fire and fire safety awareness). However, the psychometric properties of the scale are yet to be evaluated.METHOD: The reliability, validity, comprehensibility, relevance and comprehensiveness of the Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale were evaluated. Fifty-nine adults with developmental disabilities, some of whom had a history of firesetting, completed the Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale on two occasions. Feedback about the questionnaire was sought from both participants and professionals.RESULTS: The AFAS has acceptable internal consistency and excellent test-retest reliability. The attitudes towards fire, fire normalisation, poor fire safety subscales and total scores discriminated firesetters from non-firesetters. Content analysis of feedback indicated items of the AFAS were understood, relevant, accessible and comprehensible.CONCLUSION: A larger study is needed to examine the factor structure of the AFAS.
KW - Adult
KW - Firesetting Behavior
KW - Humans
KW - Psychometrics
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
U2 - 10.1111/jir.12950
DO - 10.1111/jir.12950
M3 - Article
C2 - 35621252
SN - 1365-2788
VL - 66
SP - 642
EP - 654
JO - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
JF - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
IS - 7
ER -