Abstract
Action is the primary form of communication in the domain of cybersecurity. Consider Russia attacking Georgia, Estonia, Ukraine; Stuxnet; US-China operations; even Islamic State until their recent defeats. All show actors acting first, legitimising through communication later. Despite much focus on actors using strategic narratives to articulate their vision of the past, present and future of international security, our analysis of a range of cases indicates that narratives are post-hoc and reactive to decisive actions. We propose research should address the aesthetics of these actions, the effectiveness of the persuasion or securitisation of those seeking to frame the internet as a space of war on elite and public opinion, and the need for a mapping of the global architecture of cybersecurity. Since communication is at the heart of these questions, scholars of digital politics are uniquely advantaged to build compelling explanations of interactions in the cybersecurity domain.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | A Research Agenda for Digital Politics |
Editors | William Dutton |
Publisher | Edward Elgar |
Chapter | 13 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978 1 78990 308 9 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 4 Jul 2020 |