Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to consider what safeguarding responses to discriminatory abuse and hate crime might learn from existing research on restorative justice and to drive practice development based on available evidence.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper is based on a scoping review of literature using four academic databases and reference harvesting. This comprised a critical appraisal of 30 articles, which were thematically analysed to appreciate the benefits and challenges of restorative justice responses to hate crime and how this might inform safeguarding responses to discriminatory abuse and hate crime.
Findings
The analysis identifies four domains where learning can be drawn. These relate to theory on restorative justice; restorative justice practices; perspectives from lived experience of restorative justice and hate crime; and an appraisal of critiques about restorative justice.
Originality/value
This paper connects the emerging evidence on restorative criminal justice responses to hate crime to the “turn” towards strengths-based practices in adult safeguarding. Although this provides a fertile environment for embedding restorative practices, the authors argue certain precautions are required based on evidence from existing research on hate crime and restorative justice.
The purpose of this paper is to consider what safeguarding responses to discriminatory abuse and hate crime might learn from existing research on restorative justice and to drive practice development based on available evidence.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper is based on a scoping review of literature using four academic databases and reference harvesting. This comprised a critical appraisal of 30 articles, which were thematically analysed to appreciate the benefits and challenges of restorative justice responses to hate crime and how this might inform safeguarding responses to discriminatory abuse and hate crime.
Findings
The analysis identifies four domains where learning can be drawn. These relate to theory on restorative justice; restorative justice practices; perspectives from lived experience of restorative justice and hate crime; and an appraisal of critiques about restorative justice.
Originality/value
This paper connects the emerging evidence on restorative criminal justice responses to hate crime to the “turn” towards strengths-based practices in adult safeguarding. Although this provides a fertile environment for embedding restorative practices, the authors argue certain precautions are required based on evidence from existing research on hate crime and restorative justice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 24-35 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | The Journal of Adult Protection |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 7 Feb 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Apr 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Restorative practice
- Restorative justice
- Safeguarding Adults
- Hate Crime
- Discriminatory Abuse
Research output
- 1 Article
-
A Method Worth Telling: Using Story Completion to Understand Social Work Responses to Discriminatory Abuse
Mason, K., Jul 2025, In: Qualitative Social Work. 24, 4, p. 433-449 17 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile95 Downloads (Pure)
Projects
- 1 Active
-
Social Science Impact Accelerator: Karl Mason - Working with Discriminatory Abuse in Adult Safeguarding (£8,000)
Mason, K. (PI)
10/11/25 → 20/07/26
Project: Other
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver