Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Recalibrating Human Rights in Europe: A Call to Awaken the Principle of Non-Retrogression

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The article studies the role of the European Court of Human Rights in the face of populist and illiberal challenges. Using a practice approach to study populist and illiberal norm entrepreneurship, the analysis reveals that contestation about the concept of democracy is central to the judicial recalibration of human rights. It assesses the application of the principle of subsidiarity against this background, demonstrating how the presumption of good faith fosters the recalibration of human rights in populist and illiberal terms. In response, it calls for awakening the principle of non-retrogression as a building block of the European human rights acquis. It argues that member states’ initial commitment to maintaining and furthering Convention rights comprises an obligation to refrain from adopting retrogressive (regressive) measures that roll back human rights safeguards and standards.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-126
Number of pages32
JournalThe European Convention on Human Rights Law Review
Volume7
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 30 Mar 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • democratic backsliding
  • illiberal practices
  • norm entrepreneurs
  • recalibration of human rights
  • subsidiarity
  • presumption of good faith
  • Shared responsibility
  • principle of non-retrogression

Cite this