Abstract
International human rights protection traditionally protects individuals from human rights violations committed by their own states. This has been critised by many, and feminists in particular, as failing those who are violated in the 'private sphere', by actions perpretrated by non-state actors not the state itself. Yet these are now increasingly falling within the ambit of this area of law through positive obligations and due diligence. Developments in this area are analysed with focus on recent decisions of international human rights judicial institutions on cases concerning gender-based violence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 143-169 |
| Journal | International Community Law Review |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- gender
- violence
- human rights
- international law positive obligations
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver