TY - JOUR
T1 - Pebble in Still Water
T2 - How Implementing 3D Printing Reconfigures Boundary Relations in a Hospital
AU - Polykarpou, Stavros
AU - Barrett, Michael
AU - Faraj, Samer
PY - 2018/8/1
Y1 - 2018/8/1
N2 - This paper examines how occupations mobilize, expand or defend their jurisdictional boundaries while simultaneously collaborating when a new technological innovation creates upheaval. We report on a two-year, longitudinal qualitative study of how medical 3D printing – a technology that transforms digital models into physical objects – was implemented in a UK hospital organization. We adopt a practice lens for examining boundary work practices as enacted by different occupational groups, viewing boundaries as relational, dynamic, and in a state of becoming. We extend theory on how occupations enact boundary work practices not only during adversarial encounters but also during multidisciplinary collaboration across disciplinary and knowledge boundaries. We focus on how jurisdictional boundaries are challenged over time; how new competencies are developed, new roles established, status and legitimacy challenged or reinforced and with what occupational consequences for the groups involved. Our findings highlight the ongoing jurisdictional contestations between four groups, presenting an opportunity for unpacking how the materiality of artifacts and spaces is constitutive of the way occupations mobilize, maintain and expand their jurisdictional boundaries.
AB - This paper examines how occupations mobilize, expand or defend their jurisdictional boundaries while simultaneously collaborating when a new technological innovation creates upheaval. We report on a two-year, longitudinal qualitative study of how medical 3D printing – a technology that transforms digital models into physical objects – was implemented in a UK hospital organization. We adopt a practice lens for examining boundary work practices as enacted by different occupational groups, viewing boundaries as relational, dynamic, and in a state of becoming. We extend theory on how occupations enact boundary work practices not only during adversarial encounters but also during multidisciplinary collaboration across disciplinary and knowledge boundaries. We focus on how jurisdictional boundaries are challenged over time; how new competencies are developed, new roles established, status and legitimacy challenged or reinforced and with what occupational consequences for the groups involved. Our findings highlight the ongoing jurisdictional contestations between four groups, presenting an opportunity for unpacking how the materiality of artifacts and spaces is constitutive of the way occupations mobilize, maintain and expand their jurisdictional boundaries.
KW - AOM Annual Meeting Proceedings 2018
KW - AOM Chicago 2018
U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2018.14688abstract
DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2018.14688abstract
M3 - Article
SN - 0065-0668
VL - 2018
SP - 1
EP - 6
JO - Academy of Management Proceedings
JF - Academy of Management Proceedings
IS - 1
ER -