Abstract
Deemed “misconceived and offensive” by critic Michiko Kakutani, Yann Martel’s novel Beatrice and Virgil was widely criticized for its construction of an ambiguous allegory that appears to compare animal suffering to the Holocaust. In this article, I advance an alternative reading of Martel’s novel, identifying a double-ended allegory that illuminates both the Holocaust and animal suffering and a simultaneous critique of the allegorical method. I situate the latter within the context of Holocaust writing, arguing that Martel’s novel demands that we question both the nature of ethics and the responsibility of storytelling.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 41-51 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction |
Volume | 57 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 30 Dec 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |