Abstract
This paper introduces inductive randomness predictors, which form a proper superset of inductive conformal predictors but have the same principal property of validity under the assumption of randomness (i.e., of IID data). It turns out that every non-trivial inductive conformal predictor is strictly dominated by an inductive randomness predictor, although the improvement is not great, at most a factor of e≈2.72 in the case of e-prediction. The dominating inductive randomness predictors are more complicated and more difficult to compute; besides, an improvement by a factor of e is rare. Therefore, this paper does not suggest replacing inductive conformal predictors by inductive randomness predictors and only calls for a more detailed study of the latter.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (COPA 2025) |
| Editors | Harris Papadopoulos, Khuong An Nguyen, Zhiyuan Luo, Tuwe Lofstrom, Lars Carlsson, Henrik Bostrom |
| Pages | 6-33 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Volume | 266 |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Aug 2025 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver