Abstract
The International Monetary Fund has said that it protects spending on education, health and social protection from cuts in its loan programmes through social spending floors. These measures are a welcome step forward, but are they effective? Analysis of all 17 IMF loan programmes (ECFs and EFFs) for low- and middle-income countries during the first two years of the pandemic shows that these floors are deeply inadequate, inconsistent, opaque and failing. They are little more than a fig leaf for harmful austerity, which is driving inequality, poverty and suffering.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Oxford |
| Publisher | Oxfam International |
| Commissioning body | Oxfam International |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
Projects
- 1 Finished
-
The Global Governance of Ideas: International Organisations as Agents of Policy Diffusion
Stubbs, T. (PI)
Economic & Social Res Coun ESRC
1/10/21 → 6/08/24
Project: Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver