Abstract
This chapter compares the ‘traditional’ audio description of Edouard Manet’s 1863 masterpiece Olympia with descriptions of the painting by 19th-century French critics made when it was first put on public display in Paris in 1865. This comparison suggests that descriptions that include references to artistic techniques, personal opinion, and the various ways a beholder looks at and responds to a work of art produce a more engaging and evocative audio description than the supposedly objective and neutral texts that are recommended by best practice guides. By embracing the plurality of responses to a painting, and acknowledging that different people view paintings in different ways, this chapter advocates for a more creative approach to audio description that might better capture the experience of being moved by a work of art.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Accessibility Spectrum: Moving from Access to Inclusion within Museums |
| Editors | Alison Eardley, Vanessa Jones |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Chapter | 5 |
| Pages | 62-73 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781003382713 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2025 |
Keywords
- audio description
- Impressionism
Projects
- 1 Finished
Activities
- 1 Participation in a radio programme or podcast
-
Ways of Not Seeing: BBC Radio Four programme
Thompson, H. (Speaker) & Rizzo-Naudi, J. (Speaker)
7 Oct 2025Activity: Talk, presentation or media contribution › Participation in a radio programme or podcast
Prizes
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver