Abstract
While research on domestic abuse in economics has to date almost exclusively focused on physical violence, research in other disciplines has documented that abusive males frequently also use sabotage tactics to interfere with the employability and job performance of the victim. This paper puts forward a theoretical framework that rationalizes why men may use labor market sabotage ``instrumentally'' to thwart their partners' training or career efforts. The model predicts a non-monotonic relationship between the gender wage gap and intrahoushold sabotage committed by abusive males. We explore the implications of this result in the context of various welfare policies. There are no one-size-fit-all solutions when it comes to reducing the incidence of economic abuse. Instead, specific measures have to be targeted at different types of households.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 282-295 |
| Journal | Journal of Public Economics |
| Volume | 97 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Intrahousehold Sabotage
- non-cooperative family decision-making
- Welfare Policy
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver