Early analysis of deemed consent: why Moorlock's critique is mistaken

Jordan Parsons

doi:10.1093/jlb/lsab025

Early analysis of deemed consent: why Moorlock's critique is mistaken

Jordan Parsons

Department of Law and Criminology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In a recent paper, I compared the approaches to deemed consent in England and Scotland.1 Moorlock has since responded, suggesting that I am incorrect on the points made.2 Here, I demonstrate that Moorlock’s take is problematic because it is based on misinterpretations of my arguments.

Original language	English
Article number	lsab025
Journal	Journal of Law and the Biosciences
Volume	8
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsab025
Publication status	Published - 4 Aug 2021

Access to Document

10.1093/jlb/lsab025Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{9969f8428c614f189335cdfd095fdfbc,

title = "Early analysis of deemed consent: why Moorlock's critique is mistaken",

abstract = "In a recent paper, I compared the approaches to deemed consent in England and Scotland.1 Moorlock has since responded, suggesting that I am incorrect on the points made.2 Here, I demonstrate that Moorlock{\textquoteright}s take is problematic because it is based on misinterpretations of my arguments.",

author = "Jordan Parsons",

note = "M1 - lsab025",

year = "2021",

month = aug,

day = "4",

doi = "10.1093/jlb/lsab025",

language = "English",

volume = "8",

journal = "Journal of Law and the Biosciences",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Early analysis of deemed consent

T2 - why Moorlock's critique is mistaken

AU - Parsons, Jordan

N1 - M1 - lsab025

PY - 2021/8/4

Y1 - 2021/8/4

N2 - In a recent paper, I compared the approaches to deemed consent in England and Scotland.1 Moorlock has since responded, suggesting that I am incorrect on the points made.2 Here, I demonstrate that Moorlock’s take is problematic because it is based on misinterpretations of my arguments.

AB - In a recent paper, I compared the approaches to deemed consent in England and Scotland.1 Moorlock has since responded, suggesting that I am incorrect on the points made.2 Here, I demonstrate that Moorlock’s take is problematic because it is based on misinterpretations of my arguments.

U2 - 10.1093/jlb/lsab025

DO - 10.1093/jlb/lsab025

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Journal of Law and the Biosciences

JF - Journal of Law and the Biosciences

IS - 2

M1 - lsab025

ER -