Documentary and truth on television: The crisis of 1999

John Ellis

Documentary and truth on television: The crisis of 1999

John Ellis

Department of Media Arts

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

287 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Documentary is a slippery genre to define; classifications can be out of date before the printers’ ink has dried. Acceptable documentary practice depends on a subtle three-sided process of negotiation. On one side are the habits and beliefs of audiences, what viewers will put up with or believe in. On another are the demands of cinema and television as media, how the film or programme will fit with current practices and expectations. On the third are the aspirations of film-makers and participants, cynical or idealistic, motivated to show, but also to hide.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	New challenges for documentary
Editors	John Corner, Alan Rosenthal
Place of Publication	Manchester, UK
Edition	2nd
Publication status	Published - 10 Feb 2005

Access to Document

Full Text

http://www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/catalogue/book.asp?id=1547

Cite this

@inbook{0cf8226b70ef4eefb86b787631e5d531,

title = "Documentary and truth on television: The crisis of 1999",

abstract = "Documentary is a slippery genre to define; classifications can be out of date before the printers{\textquoteright} ink has dried. Acceptable documentary practice depends on a subtle three-sided process of negotiation. On one side are the habits and beliefs of audiences, what viewers will put up with or believe in. On another are the demands of cinema and television as media, how the film or programme will fit with current practices and expectations. On the third are the aspirations of film-makers and participants, cynical or idealistic, motivated to show, but also to hide.",

author = "John Ellis",

note = "(C) 2005 University of Manchester Press, whose permission to mount this version for private study and research is acknowledged. The repository version is the author's final draft. This was also presented at a conference, August 2003.",

year = "2005",

month = feb,

day = "10",

language = "English",

isbn = "0719068991",

editor = "John Corner and Alan Rosenthal",

booktitle = "New challenges for documentary",

edition = "2nd",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Documentary and truth on television: The crisis of 1999

AU - Ellis, John

N1 - (C) 2005 University of Manchester Press, whose permission to mount this version for private study and research is acknowledged. The repository version is the author's final draft. This was also presented at a conference, August 2003.

PY - 2005/2/10

Y1 - 2005/2/10

N2 - Documentary is a slippery genre to define; classifications can be out of date before the printers’ ink has dried. Acceptable documentary practice depends on a subtle three-sided process of negotiation. On one side are the habits and beliefs of audiences, what viewers will put up with or believe in. On another are the demands of cinema and television as media, how the film or programme will fit with current practices and expectations. On the third are the aspirations of film-makers and participants, cynical or idealistic, motivated to show, but also to hide.

AB - Documentary is a slippery genre to define; classifications can be out of date before the printers’ ink has dried. Acceptable documentary practice depends on a subtle three-sided process of negotiation. On one side are the habits and beliefs of audiences, what viewers will put up with or believe in. On another are the demands of cinema and television as media, how the film or programme will fit with current practices and expectations. On the third are the aspirations of film-makers and participants, cynical or idealistic, motivated to show, but also to hide.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0719068991

BT - New challenges for documentary

A2 - Corner, John

A2 - Rosenthal, Alan

CY - Manchester, UK

ER -