Abstract
This article develops an alternative theoretical framework to the dominant ‘top-down’ macroeconomic and institutional views that have been so influential in studies of the post-socialist economic transition. The authors argue that in order to understand economic outcomes more fully, researchers need to adopt a theoretical approach that combines the sociological reasoning of the institutionalist view with micro-processual arguments that theorize employment and unemployment as outcomes of everyday social construction. Inverting the normal economic approach of starting from macro-economic trends and inferring the motives and practices of local socio-economic actors, the authors, therefore, seek to develop a ‘ground-up’ mode of explanation of unemployment dynamics that commences from the examination of the real decision-making practices and processes of socially embedded enterprise managers. Drawing on evidence from longitudinal case study research, the authors demonstrate that enterprise structuring has not been a uniform or monocausal process and highlight the angers of over-generalization from aggregated data.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1396-1410 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | The International Journal of Human Resource Management |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver