Abstract
This study follows the logic of policy transmission and begins with the characteristics of China's energy efficiency and emission reduction policy. Conclusions were drawn through literature review, CP/CI analysis, and comparative analysis of vapor and capacity parameters, boiler selection, and some emission technologies that meet ethical and sustainable standards, but Selective Non-catalytic Reduction (SNCR) technology is unethical and unsustainable.
The final analysis of the policy reaches down to grassroots participation. To conclude, energy efficiency and emission reduction policies are working smoothly for the boiler industry, but there is still much potential for improvement.
The final analysis of the policy reaches down to grassroots participation. To conclude, energy efficiency and emission reduction policies are working smoothly for the boiler industry, but there is still much potential for improvement.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 450-474 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | WSEAS Transactions on Power Systems |
| Volume | 19 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Dec 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy -
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities -
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Energy Conservation
- Conventional Boilers
- Power Sector
- Emission Reduction
- Global Warming
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver