Abstract
In this narrative, we reflect on the lived realities of conducting fieldwork across three contrasting research settings in Thailand: Hill Tribe women’s communities, Muay Thai fitness camps, and meditation retreat centres. Rather than framing fieldwork as a linear or controlled endeavour, we foreground the messiness, uncertainty, and emotional labour that shape research practice in situ. Drawing on reflexive engagement in the field, the analysis examines how access, language, time constraints, power relations, and ethical judgement differ across marginalised, commercial, and spiritual contexts. We argue that methodological competence alone is insufficient. Instead, successful fieldwork requires humility, patience, adaptability, and a relational ethic grounded in respect and trust. Through empirical vignettes, we show how moments of frustration, waiting, and apparent failure became sources of methodological insight, challenging normative assumptions about how research should be conducted. We reframe messiness not as a weakness of method, but as a condition of knowledge production, one that calls for more humane, reflexive, and context-sensitive approaches to fieldwork.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Messy Reality of Fieldwork Across the Social Sciences and Humanities Volume One: Surviving and Thriving in the Face of External Pressures |
| Editors | Neil Carr |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 2026 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver