Research output per year
Research output per year
- 14 results
Search results
-
2021
Richer color vocabulary is correlated with color memory, but its relation to perception is unknown
Lev - Ari, S., 22 Feb 2021, In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 118, 10, e2024682118.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
Open AccessFile25 Downloads (Pure) -
2020
Erratum to “Neurocognitive reorganization between crystallized intelligence, fluid intelligence and white matter microstructure in two age-heterogeneous developmental cohorts” (Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (2020) 41, (S1878929319303305), (10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100743))
the CALM Team, Apr 2020, In: Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 42, 100769.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Open Access -
2018
In the DNA Exoneration Cases, Eyewitness Memory was Not the Problem: A reply to Berkowitz and Frenda (2018) and Wade, Nash and Lindsay (2018)
Wixted, J., Mickes, L. & Fisher, R., 2 May 2018, In: Perspectives on Psychological Science. 13, 3, p. 343-345 3 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Open AccessFile152 Downloads (Pure) -
2017
A Case for Functional-Cognitive Cross-Talk
Mickes, L. & Dalton, C., 30 Mar 2017, In: Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition . 6, 1, p. 31-33 3 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Open AccessFile55 Downloads (Pure) -
Distilling the Confidence-Accuracy Message: A Comment on Wixted and Wells (2017)
Mickes, L., Clark, S. & Gronlund, S., 1 May 2017, In: Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 18, 1, p. 6-9 4 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
Open AccessFile122 Downloads (Pure) -
ROC Analysis in Theory and Practice
Wixted, J., Mickes, L., Wetmore, S., Gronlund, S. & Neuschatz, J., Sept 2017, In: Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition . 6, 3, p. 343-351 9 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Open AccessFile38 Downloads (Pure) -
2015
Evaluating eyewitness identification procedures: ROC analysis and its misconceptions
Wixted, J. & Mickes, L., Dec 2015, In: Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition . 4, 4, p. 318–323 6 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
Open AccessFile92 Downloads (Pure) -
On the applied implications of the “Verbal Overshadowing Effect”
Mickes, L. & Wixted, J., 1 May 2015, In: Perspectives on Psychological Science. 10, 3, p. 400-403 4 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Open AccessFile156 Downloads (Pure) -
ROC analysis measures objective discriminability for any eyewitness identification procedure
Wixted, J. & Mickes, L., Dec 2015, In: Journal of Applied Research in Memory & Cognition . 4, 4, p. 329–334 6 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
Open AccessFile44 Downloads (Pure) -
2014
Voluntary and involuntary processes affect the production of verbal and non-verbal signals by the human voice.
McGettigan, C. & Scott, S. K., 2014, In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 37, p. 564-565Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
File547 Downloads (Pure) -
2013
Shifts in methodology and theory in menstrual cycle research on attraction.
Harris, C., Chabot, A. & Mickes, L., 2013, In: Sex Roles.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
-
2012
Don't leave me out!
Sebastian, C., Nov 2012, In: The Psychologist. 25, 11, p. 820-823 4 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
10 Downloads (Pure) -
Three tests, three corrections: A Comment on Koen & Yonelinas (2010).
Jang, Y., Mickes, L. & Wixted, J., 2012, In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
-
2010
Useful Scientific Theories are Useful: A Reply to Rouder, Pratte and Morey (2010).
Wixted, J. & Mickes, L., 2010, In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review