Description
As many diasporic filmmakers are shedding what Kobena Mercer has called ‘the burden of representation’, addressing themes that do not relate to their ethnic background, distinctions between ‘diasporic’ and ‘cosmopolitan’ filmmaking are becoming increasingly fluid. Whereas diasporic filmmakers tend to reject the label ‘diasporic’, associated with postcolonial and labour migration, they readily self-identify themselves as ‘cosmopolitan’ with its more elitist connotations. There is also a growing tendency to frame narratives about diasporic ethnic minority subjects as genre cinema which ensures the cross-over appeal of films such as Bouchareb's war film Days of Glory.Invited Plenary Speaker at the University of Bayreuth, Germany. International conference Cosmopolitan Cinema: Arts and Politics in the Second Modernity.
Period | 3 Apr 2014 → 5 Apr 2014 |
---|---|
Event type | Other |
Sponsor |
Documents & Links
Related content
-
Projects
-
The Diasporic Family in Cinema
Project: Research
-
Migrant and diasporic cinema in contemporary Europe
Project: Research
-
Research output
-
Das Mainstreaming des diasporischen europäischen Kinos: Aus der ethnischen Nische zum populären Kino
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter (peer-reviewed) › peer-review