Legal Reasoning Workshop

  • Ribary, M. (Organiser)
  • Antony Starza-Allen (Participant)
  • Thomas Wood (Participant)
  • Toby Pilditch (Participant)
  • Giulia Maltagliati (Participant)
  • Miklos Orban (Participant)
  • Jens Madsen (Participant)
  • Vaccari, E. (Participant)
  • Lawrence Newport (Organiser)

Activity: Participating in or organising an eventParticipation in workshop, seminar, course


Over two half-days (12-13 September) in Royal Holloway’s magnificent Large Boardroom in the historical Founder's Building, data science and legal practitioners as well as scholars of law, rhetoric, computer science, complex system, and philosophy will explore the state of legal reasoning research and its application to education and practice.

Participants will look at the computational, logical, and rhetorical modelling of legal reasoning to identify the role machines and humans could play in creating persuasive legal arguments. The envisioned working environment is the predominantly case-based legal setting of the courtroom where persuasion is achieved by arguments which are legally and logically sound, and carefully crafted according to the principles of oratory and rhetoric. The aim is not simply to lay the foundation for collaborative research into legal reasoning, but we also wish to give a central role to this topic in legal education in an age when technological advancement pushes communication and argumentation skills to a decline.

We invite delegates to prepare notes on the above issues from their own disciplinary perspective by using, if they wish, the judgement in R v Bentham [2005] UKHL 18 which we propose to be a prompt for our discussion. With wide-reaching consequences about the concept of possession, the panel was seeking to answer whether “a person who has his hand inside a zipped-up jacket, forcing the material out so as to give the impression that he has a gun, be held to have in his possession an imitation firearm within the meaning of section 17(2) of the Firearms Act 1968”.

The organisers (Dr Marton Ribary and Dr Lawrence Newport) anticipate developing high-level notes prompted by this judgement into a draft position statement. The draft will also serve as the first step towards establishing a collaborative research and educational network around the topic of legal reasoning. We wish to conclude the workshop by taking concrete steps towards this goal by identifying relevant funding schemes for networking, education and research, and start drafting a proposal.

The programme is pasted below:

Monday 12 September (PM only)

12:00-13:00: Welcome buffet lunch
13:00-15:00: Session 1: Welcome, introduction / Notes on legal reasoning Part 1
15:00-15:30: Coffee break
15:30-17:00: Session 2: Notes on legal reasoning Part 2
17:00-19:00: Magna Carta walk in nearby Runnymede
19:00-21:00: Banquet dinner
Tuesday 13 September (AM only)

7:30-9:00: Breakfast at the Founder’s Dining Room (for those staying overnight)
9:00-10:30: Session 3: Discussion, Part 1 - Developing notes into a draft position statement (for possible publication)
10:30-11:00: Coffee break
11:00-12:30: Session 4: Discussion, Part 2 - Establishing a research and educational network (first steps towards a collaborative funding application)
12:30-13:00: Farewell buffet lunch
Period12 Sept 202213 Sept 2022
Event typeWorkshop
LocationEgham, United KingdomShow on map
Degree of RecognitionNational


  • Legal reasoning
  • AI
  • computational modelling
  • common law